Exit Zen
1
English type: Plain text
[[!meta title="Frequently asked questions"]]
0/450 · 45
2
English type: Plain text
- For hardware compatibility issues, refer to our [[known issues|support/known_issues]].
0/880 · 88
3
English type: Plain text
- To learn what you can do with Tails, refer to our [[documentation|doc]].
0/740 · 74
6
English type: Plain text
<h1 id="project">Tails project</h1>
21/360 · 36
11
English type: Plain text
We are deeply rooted and involved in Debian. The friendships, relationships, and technical expertise we have in Debian have many benefits for Tails, and we are not ready to build the same relationship with Ubuntu, OpenBSD, or any other distribution. See our statement about our [[contribute/relationship_with_upstream]] for details.
0/3320 · 332
12
English type: Plain text
See also the article [Why there are so many Debian derivatives](http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2011/09/why_there_are_so_many_debian_derivatives/) by Stefano Zacchiroli.
0/1730 · 173
14
English type: Plain text
First, see the answer to the [[previous question|faq#debian]].
0/620 · 62
16
English type: Bullet: '- '
Ubuntu adds features in ways that we find dangerous for privacy. For example Ubuntu One ([partly discontinued](http://blog.canonical.com/2014/04/02/shutting-down-ubuntu-one-file-services/)) and the [Amazon ads and data leaks](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/privacy-ubuntu-1210-amazon-ads-and-data-leaks).
0/3120 · 312
17
English type: Bullet: '- '
Ubuntu is led by a company that takes most of the important decisions and has the power to make them happen.
0/1080 · 108
18
English type: Bullet: '- '
We usually ship kernels and video drivers from [Debian backports](http://backports.debian.org/). The result is comparable to Ubuntu in terms of support for recent hardware.
0/1720 · 172
19
English type: Bullet: '- '
We think that the general quality of the maintenance work being done on packages matters from a security perspective. Debian maintainers generally are experts in the fields their packages deal with; while it is generally not the case outside of the limited number of packages Ubuntu officially supports.
0/3030 · 303
20
English type: Bullet: '- '
We are actively working on improving [[AppArmor support|contribute/design/application_isolation]] in Tails; a security framework that is already used in a few Ubuntu applications.
0/1790 · 179
21
English type: Bullet: '- '
We are also working on adding compiler hardening options to more Debian packages included in Tails; another security feature that Ubuntu already provides.
0/1540 · 154
23
English type: Plain text
We had users ask for LXDE, XFCE, MATE, KDE, and so on, but we are not going to change desktop. According to us, the main drawback of GNOME is that it requires quite a lot of resources to work properly, but it has many advantages. The GNOME Desktop is:
0/2520 · 252
28
English type: Bullet: '- '
Well maintained in [[Debian|faq#debian]], where it is the default desktop environment.
0/860 · 86
29
English type: Plain text
We invested quite some time in acquiring GNOME knowledge, and switching our desktop environment would require going through that process again.
0/1430 · 143
55
English type: Plain text
<h1 id="browser">Tor Browser</h1>
21/340 · 34
112
English type: Plain text
<h1 id="software">Included software</h1>
21/410 · 41
154
English type: Plain text
<h2 id="antivirus">Does Tails need an antivirus?</h2>
0/540 · 54
155
English type: Plain text
No, as other Linux systems, Tails doesn't require an antivirus to protect itself from most malwares, such as viruses, trojans, and worms. There are various reasons why Linux operating systems generally don't need antivirus softwares, including the permission design of Linux systems.
0/2830 · 283